<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slush, etc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourbestguess.com/scowl/2010/07/20/slush-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourbestguess.com/scowl/2010/07/20/slush-etc/</link>
	<description>Tobias Carroll writes fiction and reviews books and music. Welcome.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.yourbestguess.com/scowl/2010/07/20/slush-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-288279</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourbestguess.com/scowl/?p=2551#comment-288279</guid>
		<description>Jurgen -- That makes sense. As someone who&#039;s used Fictionaut, I&#039;m not entirely sure whether I should consider it a place to put stories that don&#039;t necessarily fit elsewhere (and thus theoretically create a space where they might work), or as a way to submit them for consideration without...submitting them for consideration per se. (Some of this confusion may come from the fact that the first few stories I&#039;d seen on there were excerpts from existing work -- Christian TeBordo&#039;s, for instance.)

I also wasn&#039;t sure, from the model that Hanas proposes, whether editors would look for work that&#039;s already been posted on writers&#039; websites, or would solicit work from writers based on that. Which is, admittedly, neither here nor there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jurgen &#8212; That makes sense. As someone who&#8217;s used Fictionaut, I&#8217;m not entirely sure whether I should consider it a place to put stories that don&#8217;t necessarily fit elsewhere (and thus theoretically create a space where they might work), or as a way to submit them for consideration without&#8230;submitting them for consideration per se. (Some of this confusion may come from the fact that the first few stories I&#8217;d seen on there were excerpts from existing work &#8212; Christian TeBordo&#8217;s, for instance.)</p>
<p>I also wasn&#8217;t sure, from the model that Hanas proposes, whether editors would look for work that&#8217;s already been posted on writers&#8217; websites, or would solicit work from writers based on that. Which is, admittedly, neither here nor there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurgen</title>
		<link>http://www.yourbestguess.com/scowl/2010/07/20/slush-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-288277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourbestguess.com/scowl/?p=2551#comment-288277</guid>
		<description>Hey Tobias -- as one of the co-founders of Fictionaut, I&#039;d reverse one sentence: since we&#039;re enthusiastic about this argument, we provide the sort of system Hanas is talking about. I&#039;ve experienced the frustrations of the slush pile from every angle, as reader, writer, and editor, and we built Fictionaut as a way to tackle some of those problems in a new way. Is this approach optimistic? Sure, you have to be in order to start something new. So far, it appears to be working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tobias &#8212; as one of the co-founders of Fictionaut, I&#8217;d reverse one sentence: since we&#8217;re enthusiastic about this argument, we provide the sort of system Hanas is talking about. I&#8217;ve experienced the frustrations of the slush pile from every angle, as reader, writer, and editor, and we built Fictionaut as a way to tackle some of those problems in a new way. Is this approach optimistic? Sure, you have to be in order to start something new. So far, it appears to be working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

